You know, if I didn't have a real life, and if I was the stalkerish type, I'd take a vacation and drive about the countryside (and feed stores, and Chipotles, and McDonands) of any place the mwop super sleuths guesstimate they are residing - just to pass along the exact location to authorities to help the poor working man that worked for Ick. Besides, I love road trips and I love driving around in the country listening to music and watching the barns and fields roll by. Bad enough that you stiff your supplier - but your employee? Really. Although, I am totally not surprised if this turns out to be the case.
This comment had 6 likes by MWOP readers.
Who thinks like this?
Who thinks about things like this about a stranger?
As the majority of the MWOP readers talk and diagnose Mckmama and the mental condition they are sure she has, maybe they should take a long look at their fellow MWOP members. Just by reading the comments I promise you there is lots of mental health issues within the commenter's of MWOP.
Another thing I noticed was the blogger Audrey who suddenly decided to write a blog post bashing Mckmama for her discussion about the kittens and not having them fixed. It appears Audrey is now the hero of MWOP....Audrey came by MWOP to take a bow and just happened to mention her writing gigs and her upcoming documentary about living with a weight problem. Audrey was promoting her blog and business and using Mckmama's drama to do it and the MWOP members are so dumb they can't see it. LOL
Not to mention Audrey goes on and on about her weight and how life has been so hard having people make fun of her and make her feel like a lesser person because she is obese. Of course the MWOP ladies are all pumping Audrey up and saying "You poor thing"....WAIT, back up. Did Audrey not read about how every chance they get they make fun of Mckmama and her weight? They call her every FAT name they can think of.
Maybe Audrey should write a blog posts about the MWOP members like she did about the cats. Audrey claimed she had this passion for animals, cats to be exact and that is why she felt called to write the blog post. Well based on Audrey's own words she has a passion about the feelings of people who are over weight and the way they are treated. Audrey claims this is why she writes her blog and did the documentary. Now if this is true...and has nothing to do with her CLICK for money ads on her blog....Audrey needs to write a blog post about MWOP.
Of course I doubt Audrey will write a blog post about MWOP since she gained numerous new readers and I'm sure her page views increased. Bottom line is Audrey used Mckmama to make money...plain and simple and the MWOP ladies once again got taken. Only difference is this time they got used by someone other than Mckmama...LOL
81 comments:
Why does Audrey need to write jack shit about anything just because she posted about JM?
She had an issue with the cat post of JM and she wrote about it.
I had had an issue with the TSA posts that JM had so I wrote about it.
What is your point here? That no one can write a disagreeing word about JM?
Did you read the post?
What's your definition of bashing?
Please Lauren, let us know what we can and cannot blog about because right now it's rather confusing. You post your opinion of the behavior of other bloggers, but God forbid someone do the same. So can people post about irresponsible people (aka life jackets on boats and not getting your cats fixed) or not?
Pamala I misjudged you in the past. I am sorry for that. You are are right on the money about Lauren. She can pass judgement about MWOP and its readers/commenters or NieNie (who I can't stand) but no one else is allowed to. People who post things about Jennifer get bashed and or outed by Lauren. It is her do as I say not as I do attitude that I can't figure out. But we will just be told that this is HER blog to write out HER feelings blah blah blah...
Pamala:
I know I never misjudged you...always jumping the gun and jumping the fence!!!
The point if you bothered to read....not just judge..is that Audrey is a blogger who happens to voice loud and clear her experiences of being bullied and mistreated as a person who is over weigh. Her abuse was so difficult for her that it caused her mental problems.
I think Audrey can voice her opinion about the kittens as long as she speaks about the MWOP members who make fun of people who are over weight. Of course that would be if Audrey was really true to her words of having passion about kittens and protecting the feelings of over weight people. Now if Audrey was just looking for clicks to her blog for money...you know the way Mckmama does....that is a different story. Which by the way is what I think Audrey was doing and dupped the MWOP ladies. LOL
If Audrey had never gone to MWOP I would have never written this blog post. By going to MWOP she showed me that she is talking out both sides of her mouth....her passion is truly about promoting her blog and her documentary, not about speaking out for the people who are bullied about their weight like she said. What it's not OK for people to have made fun of her but it is OK for people to make fun of Mckmama? I'm not the one claiming to be doing a documentary about the pain of being mistreated about being over weight? Audrey is, so it is her responsiblity to stand up for anyone...even Mckmama....if it is truly her passion. Otherwise, it appears that Audrey is not truly a person with passion about the cause.
My blog is about the things I see bloggers doing that I don't agree with. Notice...I said MY BLOG! You can go start your own blog to discuss what you care to discuss...oh wait you already did that!
Anon 1:50pm....you never disappoint! HAHAHAHA
But you are just the same. I just don't see how you can't see who you are? It's amazing to me, it really is.
So because you don't go to MWOP it's okay to bash people?
So what if she went to MWOP and commented and bashed JM.
And she's wrong because some MWOPers comment on weight and she should speak out about that, but come on, look at you, you run an anti-bullying blog and it's all you do.
The more you post the more evident it becomes. I'm sure there will be more than a few people who will come and defend you, state you aren't bullying anyone at all, but to me it's clear as day. You are no better than those women at MWOP.
The only thing you don't do is stalk people or go to their blogs. I'm sure the majority of MWOPers don't stalk people or go to JM's blog either.
You know what Lauren I'll take you up on your advice. I'll write a blog post about hypocritical people.
"Who thinks like this?
Who thinks about things like this about a stranger?"
Oh, me, and I own it. I love to drive, I love scenic roads, I'm nosy as hell about people and I have the time, plus an economical car. I'd not go more than a couple of hours away, but if I could make a couple hour (one way) drive where I thought I could see pretty countryside, find farmers' markets and veggie stands, plus maybe get the fun of finding someone who is trying to hide? I'd totally do it. I'd also supply a picture of the house with the SUV or trailer showing to prove I did it. Would I give the address or specific location? Would I stop there? Would I go onto the property? Uh, *noooo. Would I give the state and a vague idea by compass point of where they are? Maybe so. So, there you have an idea of who might do it, Lauren. :-)
I read MWOP for awhile today. Audrey is out for herself, building more readership, imo. I was not impressed with her and it was shocking how many jumped on the Audrey bandwagon, when under other different circumstances, those people would have been bashing her ass, too.
Lisa:
Unlike Pamala you are so honest about who you are and how you feel and I so respect that.
I agree Audrey is tooting her own horn and bullying for clicks and money...not because she has a passion about something. Sorry I call it like I see it and if someone like Pamala doesn't like that....BYE BYE....see ya later!
Honestly I wasn't that shocked the MWOP ladies jumped on the Audrey bandwagon at all...this is their MO...ANYONE who will bully right along side with them is welcomed with open arms.
Funny thing is I looked at the ones who kept saying..."Poor Audrey people treated you like that, how horrible"...these gals have profiles on disquis that you can read EVERY comment they have ever made and the same ones giving Audrey pity....are some of the ones who make fun of Mckmama and her weight. Don't take my word for it...go look for yourself.
Pretty funny and makes them look so bad....if Audrey had been talking in favor of Mckmama they would have used her weakness (being over weight) and made fun of her weight. This is how they operate time and time again. Look at what they do and say about Barb...look what they did to Summer Jo, making fun of her child. Yes, Audrey is being spared the mean comments only because she is currently on the right side of the MWOP fence. LOL
Pamala & Lauren,
for once I totally have Lauren's back on this.
That Audrey has very clearly crossed over her issues of cat treatment into MWoP.
She'll make a long post on the McK Blog and simultaneously copy it to MWoP. "Before it'll be deleted anyway, poor cat-loving her", etc. Oh, and did anybody notice how you CAN link to your blog ever so discreetly?
I remember falling for it the first time. And her blog is a kaleidoscope of hot buttons.
Don't want to be cruel, but I think she started it:
A donation aim vs. donation received begging scale > 13% out of $1,400 donated, only 3 more weeks to go. "If you wish to finance my move."
Once you find your way around the actual blog:
- Child killed ('murdered')
- Child in military
- Child pregnant
- Child overseas
- Child being abusive to family, court involved
- Child brainwashed > winning it back
- Custody lost
And that's all before she starts actually reveiling how and why she needs donations to finance a frigging move. And the weight-loss. And, never forget, the cats.
In the meantime she's clealy following the McK blog, as she would love to see a similar revenue.
Whenever there's a cat topic she'll pull that cr@p and hopefully new MWoP members will give her the all-important clicks.
And, Pamala,
Lauren is not mocking an innocent commentor while being a bully herself. My impression is that Lauren now prides herself in calling out the really rotten apples. And this one was a great example.
Still, Lauren,
It has been pointed out many times: Nobody made fun of Summer Jo's child.
Please stop stating that. They made fun of Summer Jo's child's mother.
And that was well deserved. You tape a cauliflower to your infant's head, please prepare to be mocked.
Why does anyone get to say what Audrey does or doesn't write? Is she supposed to take on every single cause? If I understood her post she went to MWOP to confront people who had posted about her there. So what if she plugged her documentary? Why is it wrong that Audrey commented for clicks, but it is okay that MckMama does?
It came out yesterday that the Mckinneys have stiffed a former employee. It's not cheap to sue for a judgment in MN so it would appear to be a substantial amount of money. Lauren why do you continue to make excuses and defend MckMama at this point? They've moved those kids four times in six years, are running from more debt than they can payback without winning a lottery, and her loyal followers are dropping like flies because she can't tell the truth about anything. I'm asking with complete respect and sincerity. I've thought MWOP has crossed the lines before (weight comments and name calling for sure) but I just can't defend MckMama anymore.
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
Kudos to Pamala. You win a nice big fat prize.
Sorry Lauren, I'm with Pamala. Audrey wrote a blog post about JM, mwopers brought her to their drama, she went to defend herself and why not give a little boost to her blog while at it.
Charlie Brown,
Nobody's telling Audrey what she can write about.
But if it's the same Audrey, she's a sad person trying to siphon the MckMoney (while bashing her).
I don't think it's about defending JM as much as it is about putting a spot light to some rotten cores. In my opinion, of course.
Somebody have a link to that Audrey blog? Is it still the barking dog?
Yeah, that's the one.
I left after reading her own comment to her [Mck hate her] blog reply:
"You nailed it! It is ALL ABOUT being responsible! :-)"
I actually read through that woman's blog once...
Being responsible has not been defined by 'not losing too many kitties along the way'.
No doubt Audrey is a sad person, but she of all people has no say in this.
Audrey's site is www.iambarkingmadDOTcom
-L
L,
Thanks.
That's the one I remembered and talked about.
She replied to a comment (left on her comment section):
"You nailed it! It is ALL ABOUT being responsible! :-)"
Not feeling it, sorry.
I'm with Pamala and Freethinker. MWOP brought Audrey into their drama. She defended herself and then used them to pump up her numbers and advertise her documentary. Well played, Audrey. Well played.
kate, it looks to me like Lauren is defending MckMama because she blasted Audrey for blasting MckMama instead of blasting MWOP for blasting MckMama. Did that make sense? There was a lot of blasting. I read it as Lauren thinks Audrey should have complained about MWOP making remarks about MckMama's weight instead of Audrey complaining about MckMama's cats. And Audrey got pulled into MWOP, she didn't go searching for them. She point blank said she can see where every click on her blog comes from.
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
Sorry Charlie Brown you have it wrong...
you said "kate, it looks to me like Lauren is defending MckMama because she blasted Audrey for blasting MckMama instead of blasting MWOP for blasting MckMama."
Once again I will say I am NOT defending Mckmama. I DO NOT agree with much of what Mckmama does. I Do NOT like the way she baits her readers. I DO NOT like the naked pictures of the children. I DO NOT like many things about her blog. This is also all true about many things Kelle Hampton does, NieNie, Dooce, and many other bloggers.
The point about Audrey is first off she went to MWOP and she knows all about MWOP. Audrey knows all the things that have been said about Mckmama and her weight. Since Audrey is the one...not me...who is the spokes person for defending people who are treated badly for being over weight (Audrey's own words) I think she should use that same passion she had for cats and speak out about the way they make fun of people with a weight problem. Now of course I also said I don't think Audrey will do this since she came to MWOP to promote her blog(PLEASE notice she has ads and she makes money each time you click on her blog) you know like the way Mckmama did. Remember this was one of the things that MWOP was so angry about.
So why give someone a click when it is so obvious she is using the MWOP and Mckmama drama to further her blog. Passion about cats has nothing to do with it.....sad thing is MWOP is so filled with hate for Mckmama they cannot she what this Audrey lady is up to....they got duped and Audrey is laughing all the way to the bank.
Again....they are all entitled to not like things about Mckmama..or any other blogger...that isn't what this post is about.
Yes Kate said it correctly....another "BAD APPLE"....
Pamela does the same thing,(or at least has done) as Audrey.
Pamela used to post on Mck's blog AND mwop with her boring blog linked up on both sites. She was riding both sides trying for clicks too. When this blog first opened she popped her head in here too. No wonder she's sticking up for Audrey, they think alike.
One more thing, just because someone posts here, doesn't mean they are sticking up for Mckmama. Lauren has made it pretty clear she doesn't care for her either, just doesn't agree with the bullying behavior. I know I personally can't stand mckmama, but I think there are some people at mwop who are soooooooo much worse than her.
It seems like people think that mck=bad mwop=good and you have to choose an alliance. I'm more of an equal opportunity hater. ;)
Audrey can write what she wants of course, that's NOT the issue. The issue is using MWOP & JM for clicks....... Bottom line, just like JM.
I don't care one way or the other, she should just own it though........ Promoting herself :)
10
Batman..
You said this so well..
Some come here (we all know who they are trying to hide behind anon) that will just try to find fault in anything I say and twist and turn things to try and make me look bad. To that I say...whateverrrrrrrrrrr....
The people who have been here from the beginning know what my intentions are and know that I am not taking sides..(so high school)...I am all about calling out the USERS and the SCAMMERS. I see it over and over the baiting, the free products and the raving reviews for said free products with no mention of receiving the product for free. I see the cliff hangers and the wordsmithing. Mckmama is not the only blogger doing this so when I see others doing it I call it out...see I will never allow my personal feelings to rule my morals and values. My personal feelings have nothing to do with right and wrong!!!!
I love what you said about "just because someone posts here, doesn't mean they are sticking up for Mckmama"...
That is what I love about the group of ladies that have come to post here on a regular basis...I think the majority feel this way.
We can say what we don't like, some may feel differently but we can all agree to disagree and no name calling and insults need be exchanged. It's called debating and acting like adults.
I also agree about some thinking you must choose an alliance. Hey sometimes I see some GREAT comments at MWOP and that is the reason I make sure to try and say not everyone at MWOP acts rude, crude and nasty. Of course the ladies at MWOP who have made civil comments that made perfect sense are usually bullied for not agreeing with the strong willed members aka the bullies.
"Lauren is not mocking an innocent commentor while being a bully herself. My impression is that Lauren now prides herself in calling out the really rotten apples. And this one was a great example."
I agree. And I also agree that Lauren certainly doesn't defend JM in all her actions. Just because someone can defend her on a few things doesn't mean they are a supporter of hers. Audrey is absolutely using MWOP. Do I blame her for it? Ehhh, I'd not do it but it's not *wrong, per se. Still, though, it is what it is and I hate seeing a family blog become all about the money, you know?
From what I have seen with this post and with Audrey and MWOP.....I dont actually see Lauren blasting or bashing Audrey at all....what I see is a whole hell of a lot of hypocrisy being talked about.
Seriously one of JM's biggest crimes with her blog is her working hard to gain clicks. Why is is then ok for someone to go to MWOP to get them to provide her with clicks?
Because JM is more then 150lbs and doesnt go out to get her hair styled and makeup put on she is a fat disgusting slob of a pig.....yet the defender of the overweight can look past the truly negative and hurtful weight comments made by these ladies because cats trump fat?
One thing is for sure though I do think that Audre has managed to play the MWOPers some and they dont even know they were played and that to me is freaking hilarious.
Exactly this Shannon! For a woman defending obese people, I do find it very hypocritical that she would jump on the MWOP bandwagon. MWOP are down right nasty about JM's weight and I don't care which way they justify their actions!
Audrey sold out for money, clicks & followers for her blog & "documentary" to me, she lost all credibility in regards to advocating for obese people.
Batman, if I was posting at people's blogs for clicks, I wouldn't be using this lame ass site, MWOP or MckMama to do that.
Plus I don't want a large readership. I enjoy the fact that I can post and not have people nitpick the hell out of me.
I post for two reasons, so my family can read about what's going on since they're all over the nation (and that's the majority of the people who read my blog anyhow), and to write because I enjoy it.
I get maybe, at best 200 hits a month, and don't feel the need to have more. I don't even have ads on my blog. So what could possibly be the point of trying to gain clicks when my blog can make me no money?
I could see why Audry would milk MWOP for all it's worth, but why would I? What could I gain from that kind of attention? Don't you think if I wanted that kind of attention I would have received it by now? I mean it's not hard to do. Just play up a child's illness, life events, etc... comment a ton on other people's blogs, email bloggers, spend hours tweeting bloggers or being on Facebook. But I don't do any of that. I rarely post at all.
But be damned if I'll keep quiet just because someone thinks she's better than the others. If Lauren doesn't want to be called out on the crap she posts, she can moderate her comments. And I'll comment on her crap as long as comments are open, or until I get bored. I'll probably get bored first.
Shannon...
I love your way of saying it...
"Cats trump Fat"...::giggle::
Thanks for bringing of the hypocrisy..this is really the issue that turned my stomach and made me see that Audrey is not credible.
Time and time again I see bloggers selling out for money..just like Mckmama did..yet they are never treated like Mckmama is. Fair is fair and I believe in treating everyone the same...nothing personal..just the facts!
You do have to laugh about MWOP getting duped by Audrey...in a way they deserve to be duped cause they are so narrow minded in their thinking. To them Mckmama is evil and THE END!!!
I believe we all can change and everyone should be given a second chance...even people like Mckmama.
Anon 8:28am
well said!
"Audrey sold out for money, clicks & followers for her blog & "documentary" to me, she lost all credibility in regards to advocating for obese people."
I agree 100%
Pamala:
If this is such a "LAMEASS SITE" why are you here?
You are more than welcome..unlike some places, to give your opinion. Just please do it with respect and understand SOME may not agree with you and they are allowed to say that. Also please make sure you have your FACTS correct...I never said I was defending Mckmama and I just said Audrey wasn't being fair in blogging about cats because of her passion yet said nothing about her other passion over weight people being bullied and made fun of. It was a blog post to show the hypocrisy and to show that Audrey had a passion for nothing more than money, clicks and gaining new blog followers. Even if the blog followers happen to be the types of people her documentary would be based on...you know bullies and mean girls making fun of others for their physical appearance.
Believe me...I didn't just write that blog post without doing my homework. I went and read Audrey's blog and understood she was Barking Mad about the way she had been treated. This is why I made the decision to write about this...you may consider reading some of it to truly understand how I came to this opinion.
Oh Pamela, I've seen you around since mwop1, back then you were linking to your blog on mwop and mck's page. Just like you did here and whatdoyaknow, now you've unlinked it. That doesn't make you look a little guilty now, does it?
You said: "I don't even have ads on my blog. So what could possibly be the point of trying to gain clicks when my blog can make me no money?"
Gotta get those clicks to get those ads, don't play dumb.
Honestly, I don't care. You can call out Lauren, and I'll call you out. It's all good fun. :D
"I'll probably get bored first."
One can only hope!
Umm, Anon 5:12. "Trying to take credit for what Anja did"? Really? Think you need to open up that mind and those eyes just a tiny bit. Let's not get into semantics...it's the McKinney's third house that they walked away from. WALKED AWAY FROM THEIR OBLIGATION. Tomato or taaaamaaaaaato. Call it what you will. They lost a 3rd house due to their inability to make the payments. AND ANJA herself gave credit to Shell. Pull it together girlfriend. Frealz.
I agree, technically it was NOT a foreclosure. Anja was just being nice to Shell ( who totally dropped the ball and ran away like a little biotch) she got the documents (shell said she would but couldn't come through) she organized a FACTUAL, DETAILED post stating who, what ,how & when etc....and really put thought & effort into that whole post! Anja totally rocked the facts and should be given ALL the credit! We all knew JM would loose the house, so calling that is like calling that the sun is gonna shine. Shell did NOT have timeline, Facts or the know how to not call it a foreclosure!!!!!
annie
I have no doubt shell is right in there with that moron shelmo, anja only gave her credit to keep them off her back. Can you imagine having to take that blog over after those incompetant fools pulled the stunts they tried to pull?
Susie
Ummmm, Annie...how many months ago did Shell and all of the mods make the post about a 3rd foreclosure? 3 months ago? 4 months ago? Based upon information that was gathered from a public website? And now it's 3 or 4 months later and Anja, who is the last standing mod of the blog FINALLY got the paperwork?? Paperwork which was initiated by Shell. Nobody is taking ANYTHING away from Anja...or anybody else. Well, some people aren't. Some of you are. Not sure why. I think you ladies need to open a nice bottle of wine and chillax...just a little bit. ;)
"Ummmmmm", I''m not sure why you keep using that, is it because you're not sure what you're talking about?
annie
I believe it was 4 - 5 months ago shell made that post, and like I said, everyone say it coming. Doesn't take a rocket scientist, or teacher for that matter to figure it out ;)
*saw* opps! I know how much that "teacher" hates spelling mistakes :)
Ummmmmm...because I'm baffled by the...
Yeah, that's it.
A BIG UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
AND...
if were such common knowledge that they were going to lose their 3rd home...I didn't see too many other people posting about the possibility of it.
*everyone* saw it coming? I for one did not.
Why is it okay for Shell to have used the word "foreclosure", which JM would have had to have had a "mortgage" to have a foreclosure (so it's wrong). JM uses the word "mortgage" and the Mwopers jump on her for word smithing? Couldn't that be said for Shell. CFD, mortgage, 2 different things. So is walking away from a CFD, and Foreclosing on a home.
So gals, is this word smithing on Jm's part or Shell's part or both? I say both! Nice try though..........
xtina
And just out of curiosity, do you take Viagra for that hard-on that you have for Shell? You realize it's not healthy, don'tcha? For an erection over 3 hours you should call your doctor. Just a friendly tidbit of advice.
Aren't you a charmer let's get real, hurry back over to mwop along with the other crude 'ladies'
xoxo
Crude? Really? Have you called ABC, CBS, and NBC to complain about their commercials? No? Didn't think so. It's only "crude" when you're looking in the mirror, eh?
Wow! Where did that come from? Just asking a simple question, where's that wine you were drinking? You know, the one that helps you "chillax".
Take a swig, big one please, and hop on back to your group. I think everyone is quite done with you now :)
xtina
Yes crude, why are you asking people here about whether they have erections for shell? Keep on staying classy! Why am I surprised though, it is typical mwop trash coming here to defend their leader. Stupid shellple.
Xoxo
I for one do NOT have a "hard on" for Shell :) Although Not Shelmo and Jenni what's her face (JOS) are gonna have a baby together! Eeeek! Aren't you just so excited for them!!! It's like we're back in jr. high y'all!!! They announced it on the blog and everything!! Wonder who has the hard on for who in that relationship? My guess is Shelmo for jenni, Shelmo needs to get it from somewhere I guess *shrugs*
annie
Eh. Done with me? Doubt it. I'm sorry. I didn't realize there was a comment quota and that I had exceeded it???? Also wasn't aware that this site was invitation only. Oh? It's not?? Suck it up girls. The truth can be so very ugly.
Oh that's right poor shelmos running coach ran for the hills. Wonder why she didn't have a cutesy little limerick for that, oh that's right she saves them for making fun of jen mck and obviously now for jenny os. Couple of real classy women there.
Okay, I'm just gonna ignore the troll now.......
Moving on. I think JM is NOT living in a house at all. By the looks of her walls I think she is living in a trailer or mobile home. That is NOT a "farm house". I think it's a mobile placed on a farm sure, but the walls are that of mobiles. Not that there is anything wrong with that, it's just that I think she is being more vague then we know.
annie
That would be Jennifer, not Jenni. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. I didn't realize that having a friendship with somebody and being silly was against the law. My apologies. Feel free to Google my name and look for innocent pictures of my child OR of my wedding pictures that include a REALLY CUTE pair of thong panties (AGAIN) and post the link. Yes, because THAT's what "classy" women do.
"Classy" women also brag about their income and the size of their homes too, right Jennifer?
And I apologized for that, didn't I Anon 7:08? I admitted that I acted like an ASS and I apologized.
Which is more than I can say for what some of the ladies here did.
Y'all do seriously realize that nobody that is on MWOP or here or any such site can even attempt to call themselves 'classy' right? I mean is it supposed to be some sort of badge of honor or something? Pots and kettles ladies, pots and kettles.
No worries shannon, you are the farthest thing from classy. Anyone see the picture of a drunk shannon falling on the floor with her muffin top spilling out of her way to small shirt? Well it was posted on oopsie daisy, shows just how far from classy she is.
LMAO Shannon! That's an interesting, ummmmm...point!
LOL yep Anon 724....last year on my birthday I got rather intoxicated and fell on the floor. Funny though because the shirt wasnt actually small but the someone tried to catch me and up it went. I dont care if you find that classy or not....I was enjoying life. And anyone that knows me knows that was probably the 3rd time in probably 10 years I have been anywhere close to that drunk.
I find the picture to be rather funny myself....hence submitting it to Lisa to post on Daisy LOL
I'm REALLY trying to ignore the trolls....... Let's just pretend they're not here:) Jenni likes it that way :)
@Anon7:41: From someone that knows Shelmo, you are SO wrong about her. But you think whatever you want to make yourself happy. Leaving Shell out of things is a good idea, she's gone. End of story.
@Shannon, for what's it worth...keep being real...it's much more admirable than trying to be/portray something that you're not. And who hasn't been there before? The majority of us have. Glad you had fun!!
Shell is sooooo not gone! Nice try though :) Also, nice of you to sing her praises ver on the blog. I'm sure she gave you 2 thumbs up for that and a "like" on FB.
Thanks Jennifer....seriously I am me...that is it...I dont hide it. I am the same person online as I am in person. People love me or hate me that isnt my problem because the people that love me are all that I want in my life anyway.
I have to say that I LOVE it when people try to "out" me with stuff they found online about me........ummmmmmm hello idiots I am the one that put that shit out there how can you out me with it???? Obviously I am not embarrassed about it because I put it out there.
Freaking morons :)
And really they are a bit on the crazy side of JM does nothing right. Maybe they decided to give up on their CFD on the house in Becker because of the stalkers who were just showing up and taking pics of them and their home at the drop of a hat.
So funny
xshell
Shannon is Back !!! with her POTTY MOUTH FOR YA!!!
Where was I being a potty mouth?
omg! Shell is back!!! With her LOUD MOUTH AND LAME COMMENTS FOR YA!!!!
Shannon,
I read the CFD and the Mckinneys can't just walk away from it. They can't sell or rent it either. They are under contract to make the monthly payment for five years. Now that I type it out you were being sarcastic, huh?
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
LOL I was being sarcastic :) But I think that as a "normal" person I would be getting out of there once I realized that people were doing that. Doesnt change the fact that this is in fact house #3 that they have walked away from.
Lauren, thanks for this and the last post. I'm not and never will be pro JM but I do strongly believe she has the right to make a living and not be "stalked".
Plus the fact that she appears to be like the energizer bunny who takes a licking and still keeps on ticking is quite remarkable. She's either a glutton for punishment or has a thicker skin then most of us.
Regarding the houses she "lost":
They obviously were doing quite well financially while residing in House #1 so decided to "move on up" and purchase House #2. They made the rookie mistake of agreeing to buy House #2 before selling House #1.
They found themselves with a downturn in the economy and a house that wouldn't sell and carrying two mortgages.
They behaved in a very simple minded way as they fell behind on their double house payments and knew they were losing the homes, the contract for deed house no doubt looked attractive. Even though the monthly costs were astronomical (Ridiculous move on their part IMHO, certainly not downsizing) they probably were a lot less then what they had been paying on the two homes.
Throw in the fact that JM and IM are very prideful people and a misguided sense of public importance they again made an immature and stupid mistake of thinking that their current status quo would never change.
Now seeing what they were paying each month, I'm surprised they lasted this long at the Becker residence. The house value dropped in half, they had another mouth to feed, Israel was no longer working and all their past financial decisions were coming up to bite them.
They needed to get out of there and start over, so even though they've now made a series of poor decisions, IMHO they had to keep a roof over their heads.
Yes, they also need to "Get over themselves" and realize they need to support those children the best way they can AND find jobs/keep working and repay all that they owe. I really hope that they are doing that now. Only time will tell.
Re: MWOP
I was under the weather last week and out of boredom read mwop for a few days. It proved to be a great sleep aid. Couple of comments and I was drifting off to dreamland. ;)
However, it really is quite interesting to see how some of the more vitriolic posters have reinvented their own personal history since I left a few months ago and new people have arrived on mwop.
The same people who were bitter and described their downtrodden, poor and abusive life when JM was living "high on the hog" have appeared to fly up to the top of the ladder as JM fell down a few rungs and are now touting their own sunshine and rainbow life while dissing her fall from grace. Double standard anyone?
Lastly I don't get this "Anja worship"? Anja is a "figurehead". A figurehead with an email address.
The server mwop sits on belongs to Shell. She's never "left" no matter how much she/Mrs. N. Binklee and her gf or any other cronies declare it.
There are so many "alter egos" on mwop for all anyone knows there may only be 5 people with several different names each conversing on there. They've certainly accused JM of doing it.
Ask yourself mwopers who read here, why the internal sh*t always "hits the fan" on mwop when there is any JM controversy happening?
IMHO, The pot stirring on mwop has always come from within.
JM isn't the only person baiting for clicks.
Coco, I have several questions then:
1) How do you know that Anja is/isn't a figurehead?
2) How do you know Shell hasn't left and/or is involved in some way with the blog, other than sharing server space?
3) How do you know there are alter egos on mwop?
4) What are you referring to with "internal sh*t" and "pot stirring"?
No accusations, just trying to sort out pure speculation from the facts. -L
L,
1) "Anja" has not moved the blog to another server.
2) The blog server is owned by Shell. Supposedly Shell had left before, then came "back" to comment when I disagreed with the core opinion. So no, I don't think she's ever left.
3) Watch for certain patterns of speech. People have a hard time changing the way they write a sentence, grammar, spelling etc. The alter egos are there.
4) Internal conflict happens on mwop the same way it happens on MCK's blog/facebook. Phony dissenters will post to get a rise out of the "regular mwopers", same people respond indignantly.
(If you step away and look back you can see patterns of this behavior,)
Pot stirring successful, internal sh*t and more clicks for mwop as someone always "leaks" the inner conflict at mwop to the mckmasses.
Rinse, Repeat.
L, I have a couple of questions for you. You seem like a kind, caring person. You always stick up for Anja even though as far as I know you only "know" her through email.
1)Why are you on mwop?
2) What do you think you'll achieve being on mwop?
3) Do you really enjoy watching someone's life self destruct?
4) Do you feel vindicated like the others who are chest bumping and high five-ing now that the mck's have lost another house?
I ask this honestly because personally I'm ashamed I was ever part of that blog.
Coco,
1) & 2) The impression that I've gotten before is that it's easier and cheaper to share a server, but that's totally separate from having access to the actual blog (like WordPress and Disqus logins, for example). I don't think sharing a server makes a case for anything but being economical.
3) The alias / alter ego thing is tough because a lot of the commenters like to change their user names to fit whatever drama is going on. I think it's a little nuts and doesn't help to foster a sense of community when that's constantly happening, but it's not my blog.
4) The internal conflict I don't quite get, but that's okay. There are always dissenters that pop up, but I don't think it's staged, and I don't think it's done for clicks. Again, just my take.
On to your questions:
I don't know Anja personally but I have e-mailed with her so much that sometimes it feels like I do. I'm sure she wishes otherwise :) Her writing style is different from the others, too (previous mods) which is why I find it so hard to buy that she's just a figurehead. I have opinions on how I think the blog should be run and I dislike the drama and nitpicking, so we've talked back and forth a number of times. She seems pretty level headed and low drama, as well. She doesn't rush into much.
1) I don't have a definitive answer for that, to be honest. I comment very rarely and only if I have a worthwhile logical point to make, and it's usually in disagreement with someone.
I don't want to see JM go down in flames but I do wish she would stop digging her own grave, financially, ethically and spiritually speaking. I understand the point of the site but I wish the comments could be removed; it would be a really different 'tone,' I think.
2) I try to add some logic and calm when I can; I don't agree with the drama or the nitpicking at all.
3) Definitely not.
4) I don't feel vindicative but I wasn't suprised, either. I assumed some of JM's endeavors lately were due to failing finances, so I also assumed they would have to leave that pricey house at some point or another.
This is getting way too long. Sorry!
-L
Coco,
You said it yourself so well, the alter egos are very much there at MWOP, signing on and commenting under different names to cause dissent, drama and conflict. It's boring & tedious.
As you mentioned, there are patterns of speech, grammar, syntax etc. that are easily detected when you spend time looking for them. They slip up and it's obvious when you know.
And you very well do know, crazed, two-faced, ship-jumping Bitch you are, because you are the worst offender. Your style is very easy to spot.
Practice what you preach Honey.
Olivia
"Olivia" or is this Mrs. N. Binklee?
Touched a nerve? Blown your cover?
Sorry to disappoint you, but I've only ever been myself on mwop, here or anywhere.
Good try though.
I posted a comment to Coco but it was rather long. Lauren, did it disappear into spam? Sorry! -L
Coco, if I had your email address I'd send you this personally, but since I don't, I'll address it here. You're wrong about Olivia being N.B. No nerves touched, just wanted to let you know that you're incorrect in your assumption. I wanted to point this out because you're insinuating something about a friend of mine that simply not true.
Coco, I just posted a comment to you regarding the Olivia/NB assumption that you made. I'm requesting your email address from Lauren so that I might address this off-line.
Haven't we all agreed that the outing of people is immature and uncalled for here? That would include you, Coco. I don't what information you think you might have on someone, but we don't out people here. Go back over to MWOP if that's your intention.
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
I must of misunderstood, I thought this was Lauren's blog.
Anon 8:00,
IF you realize it's Lauren's blog then you know to sign a name. Oops. You would also know she has stated no more outing people. Oops again.
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
Charlie Brown and JOS,
I have information on someone?
Seriously?
Why? Because I used a nickname I've heard used on mwop before and suddenly I'm outing someone?
Don't you hard core mwopers realize that not everyone thinks the same as you do?
That some of us don't agree with how you attack JM for every little thing?
Of course the status quo is speak your mind about what you feel is bullying on mwop and get bullied back.
So predictable.
Sorry I have no intentions of ever going back to mwop,
I'll leave that cesspool of bickering and nastiness to both of you.
Oops, why did you assume I was speaking about you?
Oops your bad!
Bummer!
L,
Thanks for your comments. I don't know who you are on mwop but I do know that not all of us were negative all the time and often objected to what was written.
I appreciate your insight on Anja. I witnessed some nasty stuff on mwop when I peeked in this week. I wouldn't want her job, surely she finds it draining and perhaps somewhat pointless?
JM's life is her own to live. Who are we to police her? I do believe she's made many, many mistakes in lots of areas but none of us REALLY have all the facts no matter how many documents people dig up.
Leaving her alone may change her for the better or send her into obscurity.
JOS,
I will reply directly now that your comment is out of spam. Throwing out the Mrs. N. Binklee was a "shot in the dark" so to speak after I saw someone use the name on mwop.
I was not implicating anyone in particular by using it.
However, "Olivia" was implying that I used several aliases on mwop which I can quite honestly and equivocally say is not true. "Olivia's" reacting to my post with such vitriolic name calling, one could assume I hit a nerve somewhere.
So you'll have to take me at my word and I will take you at yours.
Coco,
Not a hard core MWOPer. I read Anja's posts and stay out of the comments unless someone mentions something worth reading.
Good Grief,
Charlie Brown
Post a Comment